Academic Matching Prototype

Explainable guidance for course selection

Built a proof of concept that maps profiles, skills, and learning goals to course options using semantic scoring and transparent, taxonomy-based alignment.

3 months Modern web stack • Backend APIs • Vector search • Explainable scoring Launched July 2025 (POC)
Why this project

The Challenge & Goal

The mismatch problem

Students often struggle to find courses aligned with their actual competencies, career goals, or skill progression. Traditional matching systems rely on static keyword mapping or manual advisor input - neither scalable nor intelligent.

What the client needed

They wanted a matching engine that could analyze profiles and learning objectives, then suggest courses based on cognitive depth alignment (taxonomy scoring). The system needed to make nuanced distinctions - like differentiating between "understand" and "apply" level outcomes - while staying fast and transparent.

Our mission

We set out to build a fast, explainable prototype capable of mapping thousands of profiles to course modules in near real time. The focus was not just accuracy, but interpretability, scalability, and measurable alignment.

Semantic matchingTaxonomy alignmentVector searchFast prototypingExplainable outputs
Match Quality
91%
based on sample evaluation
Response Time
< 1.2s
avg query latency
Explainability
100%
traceable scoring
Scalability
10k+
profiles handled in tests
How we solved it

Our Approach

What we did

  • Built a parsing pipeline for profiles and course outcomes.
  • Implemented cognitive-level tagging to score fit with transparent reasoning.
  • Added a retrieval layer for semantic matching at scale.
  • Designed a clean UI for interactive queries and recommendations.
  • Deployed a test environment with benchmarking for latency and accuracy.

Our process

Discovery
2 weeks

Reviewed course data and sample profiles. Defined evaluation metrics and created a taxonomy scoring approach for alignment.

Build
6 weeks

Implemented semantic retrieval and a scoring layer. Connected frontend and backend APIs for interactive recommendations.

Test Release
1 week

Deployed the POC to a test environment. Benchmarked latency, quality, and scalability and shared results with stakeholders.

Services covered

ResearchData parsingBackendFrontendEvaluationDeployment
How it’s built

Architecture & Stack

Frontend
  • Responsive UI
  • Fast search experience
  • Clear result explanations
API Layer
  • Recommendation endpoints
  • Scoring + explanations
  • Validation
Data
  • Structured records
  • Vector retrieval store
  • Caching layer
Scoring
  • Semantic embeddings
  • Taxonomy alignment
  • Reasoned explanations
Infra
Cloud compute • Artifact storage • Edge delivery
Monitoring
Error tracking • Uptime checks • Performance logs
Pipeline
CI checks • Automated deploys • Benchmark scripts

Deployment pipeline

Build & Test
CI checks • Unit tests • API tests
Deploy
Container builds • Staged rollout • Rollback support
Monitor
Logs • Alerts • Uptime checks auto alerts

Stack summary

Frontend
  • Search UI Fast, clear interactions
  • Results Transparent scoring and reasoning
  • UX Mobile-first layout and accessibility
Backend
  • APIs Typed responses and validation
  • Retrieval Vector-based similarity search
  • Caching Lower latency on repeat queries
Scoring layer
  • Embeddings Semantic representations
  • Alignment Taxonomy-based scoring
  • Explanations Traceable reasoning output

Key integrations

Embedding provider· Semantic vector generationVector store· Fast similarity searchCloud· Compute and storageEdge delivery· Low-latency UI
What shipped & why it matters

Results & Impact

Delivered a working course matching POC with real-time recommendations and clear, explainable scoring.

Demonstrated measurable improvements in relevance and usability for guidance workflows during testing.

Explainable matchingSemantic scoringPrototype-ready
Feature highlights
  • Profile and course outcome parsing
  • Semantic similarity scoring
  • Taxonomy-based alignment visualization
  • Interactive recommendation UI
  • Transparent explanations for each result
  • Evaluation-ready outputs

Innovations

Alignment-aware scoring

Enabled cognitive-depth based matching instead of keyword similarity.

Fast retrieval

Optimized semantic search delivering sub-second results.

Explainable recommendations

Each recommendation included a traceable breakdown of why it was suggested.

Impact across guidance workflows
  • Improved recommendation relevance in evaluation runs.
  • Enabled scalable guidance without manual keyword tuning.
  • Created a foundation for larger datasets and future deployments.
Next steps
  • Planned user validation with academic stakeholders to refine scoring logic.
  • Roadmap to expand datasets and improve ranking with broader signals.
Operational notes
  • Containerization planned for multi-tenant deployment options.
  • Benchmarking planned on larger datasets for the next iteration.