Explainable guidance for course selection
Built a proof of concept that maps profiles, skills, and learning goals to course options using semantic scoring and transparent, taxonomy-based alignment.
Students often struggle to find courses aligned with their actual competencies, career goals, or skill progression. Traditional matching systems rely on static keyword mapping or manual advisor input - neither scalable nor intelligent.
They wanted a matching engine that could analyze profiles and learning objectives, then suggest courses based on cognitive depth alignment (taxonomy scoring). The system needed to make nuanced distinctions - like differentiating between "understand" and "apply" level outcomes - while staying fast and transparent.
We set out to build a fast, explainable prototype capable of mapping thousands of profiles to course modules in near real time. The focus was not just accuracy, but interpretability, scalability, and measurable alignment.
Reviewed course data and sample profiles. Defined evaluation metrics and created a taxonomy scoring approach for alignment.
Implemented semantic retrieval and a scoring layer. Connected frontend and backend APIs for interactive recommendations.
Deployed the POC to a test environment. Benchmarked latency, quality, and scalability and shared results with stakeholders.
Delivered a working course matching POC with real-time recommendations and clear, explainable scoring.
Demonstrated measurable improvements in relevance and usability for guidance workflows during testing.
Enabled cognitive-depth based matching instead of keyword similarity.
Optimized semantic search delivering sub-second results.
Each recommendation included a traceable breakdown of why it was suggested.